Wednesday, January 07, 2009

Police and the Police Station

I started thinking about how a business would go about dealing with the police/police station issue. First, it would analyze the need. Then it would analyze the choices. Then it would pick the choice that produced the desired result at the most economical cost.

Here's how that process would go.

Need: (a) Egremont spends much more on police, on a per capita basis, than most other towns our size. Are we getting value for our money? (b) Do we need that level of police presence? What does the chief think in that regard? (c) What would happen if we didn't have a police department? (d) What are the realistic space needs (not desires) of the department?

Choices: (a) There are serious discussions going on about consolidation of our two local school districts. How about police consolidation? (For that matter, how about fire department consolidation?) (b) How do Alford, Hillsdale, etc., provide police protection? Is the way they do it appropriate for Egremont? (c) If we cut the budget to a level in line with other towns our size, what would we lose in protection? (d) Taking into account the realistric needs of the police department, could we consolidate some of the second floor offices to provide more space for the department?

Costs: (a) Should we be spending more money on a department that already costs far more than other towns? If so, how much more? (Does anyone do cost/benefit analyses in Egremont?) (b) We're looking at a possibly protacted period of hard economic times. Other costs of government will likely increase. Can we afford increased police department spending under those circumstances? (c) What's the difference in cost between putting an addition onto town hall and building a new structure? What do we get/lose for that difference?

One other factor that people keep using to justify action is the noncompliance of town hall with handicapped access. I modestly suggest the possibility of doing nothing in that regard, at least for now. First, there are many ways we can provide practical access for the relatively small number of people in town who are affected, rather than spending huge amounts reconfiguring town hall. Second, I don't see much risk of zealous enforcement by government agencies in times when towns are strapped for funds. Whether I'm right or wrong, why not wait until they come after us?

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

just a thought not long ago we had a murder in this town, two or was it three suicides, we have constant wife beatings, just Saturday i found a pile of drug paraphenalia on the dump road. There has been dog sacrifices,our police chief was hit by a felon on a hit and run, there is a known local child abuser on the board at the p.o. a big time theft ring the list does go on. so the police does do more than just give tickets for snow and the daily speeder.we are at the hub of the state. just food for thought!

Anonymous said...

Also I was ticked to see how Bruce Cumsky handled his comments in the Record towards our police. Last time I checked when you are in essence a boss and you have an issue its common courtesy to speak to your employees on an issue. If the selectboard doesn't like the way the police act they need to take it up in private and not through the paper as a bully pulpit for votes. How unclassy! I expect more.

Anonymous said...

We don't need to spend more money on the police department (or a library) when Egremont and every single town in MA will be getting less state aid.

Can't everyone realize that we're in an economic crisis. Taxes in Egremont keep going up up up and up with nothing to show for it.

Middle class people who live here are struggling to get money together to fill our cars and to have gas/oil in our furnaces.

Enough with all these grand schemes to spend more and more money. I just want provide for my family and it's getting harder and harder.

Let's get proper infrastructure so I can make a cell phone call or get internet access.

Anonymous said...

Where are all these crimes happening????

No one knows what you're talking about Ms. Turner.