Also interesting is Selectman Flynn's attempt to elevate policeman Pilone to the chief's position by, among other things, saying how great he is. How quickly things can change. Would you like to explain Mr. Flynn? I won't hold my breath.
Here's the transcript:
Mr. Swanson: The
complaint that was a petition that was filed with the Select Board that lead to
the removal of Reena Bucknell, will that be made public?
Selectman
Turner: Well, there wasn’t
really a petition, that was a vote of no confidence by the police officer.
Mr. Swanson: So,
it’s an oral—
Selectman Brazie: No,
it was written. And it’s already been
made public. It was attached to the
minutes that, so, would you like a copy?
Mr. Swanson: And
the second question is, once this petition was submitted, what was the process
that the select board went through that led to the decision to suspend
Ms. Bucknell, Chief Bucknell, with pay?
Was there a review, a discussion with Bucknell, was there, are there
files or documents?
Selectman
Turner: She wasn’t attending
at, present at, that meeting.
Selectman Brazie: Right.
Mr. Swanson: Did
you decide in the meeting?
Selectman
Turner: Yes, we did.
Selectman Flynn: Yes,
we did.
Mr. Swanson: Okay. Why did you not go through a more formal
process that would be [Inaudible].
Selectman
Turner: What would have been
the formal process?
Mr. Swanson: Pardon
me?
Selectman
Turner: What would have been
the formal process?
Mr. Swanson: Well,
normally, in, in—
Selectman
Turner: We initiated an
investigation at that time.
Mr. Swanson: After
suspending her.
Selectman
Turner: Yes, and that’s the
formal process that—
Mr. Swanson: Why
did you decide to suspend her based on a complaint from her employees rather
than discuss it with her?
Selectman Brazie: ’Cause
it wasn’t a single complaint, actually.
There were several complaints.
Mr. Swanson: Presented
simultaneously?
Selectman Brazie: Yes.
Speaker: Mm hm.
Speaker: Yeah.
Selectman Brazie: Along
with the vote of no confidence.
Selectman
Turner: I think we had the full
there—
Mr. Swanson: She
thought that was the full story [Inaudible].
Selectman
Turner: With a full group of
officers it was, it was either we had a police department or we had a
chief. I don’t think there was a, and I
think it was a—
Mr. Swanson: So,
the people, the officers who presented the petition, the vote of no confidence
were ready to resign their positions?
Selectman
Turner: I think they were.
Mr. Swanson: They
made that clear? Explicit?
Selectman
Turner: Explicit.
Mr. Swanson: Explicit.
Selectman
Turner: They were here that
night in force. Every member of the
police department.
Mr. Swanson: So,
it was a simple, “If you don’t suspend her immediately, we’re resigning our
positions”?
Selectman Flynn: What
we did is we took the information that the officer provided to us. We had some information already that we
thought was pertinent including a most current eval and we had also consulted
with our attorney to determine if—
Mr. Swanson: Before
you suspended her?
Selectman Flynn: Yes.
Mr. Swanson: Okay.
Selectman Flynn: We
consulted with our attorney and determined that the best process to follow was
to suspend her with pay pending an investigation. Which is exactly what we did.
Mary had spoken with counsel during the day or maybe it was me that
spoke with counsel.
Selectman Brazie: I
think it was you. I was—
Selectman Flynn: It
was me. Because I had heard that
something like this would take place, and I asked counsel as to the best
process to follow and that’s what counsel suggested. And that’s the process that we followed.
Mr. Swanson: From
a business perspective, it’s an extremely peculiar process.
Selectman Flynn: This
is not New York State. This is the
State of Massachusetts. This is the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
Mr. Swanson: My
experience is not in New York State.
Selectman Flynn: Let
me finish.
Mr. Swanson: Yeah.
Selectman Flynn: You’ve
had your chance to talk.
Mr. Swanson: I
don’t know why you say that.
Selectman Flynn: Let
me finish. This is the Commonwealth of
Massachusetts, and what we try to do is afford her every opportunity, including
the opportunity to be at that meeting.
She chose not to be at that meeting.
For whatever reason, we do not know.
Mr. Swanson: I’m
wondering why you assume that my business experience was in the State of New
York.
Selectman
Turner: Okay, this is not a
conversation—
Selectman Flynn: We’re
not having a conversation about this.
Selectman
Turner: This is between us and
the board, and the board made a decision.
Selectman Flynn: I
realize you like to carp about things, as you have accused me in the past,
okay? But we’ll talk about it
afterwards, okay?
Mr. Swanson: Okay.
Selectman
Turner: It was a decision the
board—
Selectman Flynn: We
made it as a board.
Selectman
Turner: The board made it based
on issues that culminated that night with a vote of no confidence. There have been some issues prior to that,
it was, there was—
Mr. Swanson: Just
to be clear, I’ve never met Reena Bucknell.
I don’t know anything about her.
Selectman
Turner: Okay, well, there was a
lot of behind the scenes stuff that not a lot of people are aware of that we
were, that culminated that night with that.
It wasn’t just that night that we decided to do it. There was, there was—
Selectman Flynn: Fourteen
years and sixty officers.
Selectman
Turner: Not only that, but we
had—
Mr. Swanson: Compared
to what?
Selectman
Turner: We had just hired two
new officers that were extremely qualified or had been on the job for three or
four months and we’d had a meeting prior to that night in which we tried to
iron out some of the issues and found it kind of tense, at best.
Mr. Swanson: Yes.
Selectman
Turner: And then a lot of
things fell into place after that, that resulted in what we did. I think there’s a lot more to it than just
the vote of no confidence that night. There
were some other things that were happening behind the scenes.
Selectman Flynn: When
we tried to get close to particular facts and particular situations, there was
a tendency of the chief to want to change the subject or move on to something
else. And we got close to some issues
that really should have been discussed and she was more anxious in closing the
meeting and moving on to a training session.
I think every effort was made to give the chief an opportunity to
discuss it, and we’re still willing to have a public meeting with the
chief. If the chief chooses to do that,
we will be more than happy to have that public meeting so that she can address
each and every one of those charges. We
want this to be, and what we have tried to do, is keep this whole process as
open and honest as we possibly could.
It’s a tough thing to do, but I think one of the things that this board
has done is we made that report available as soon as we possibly could. We went through to three counsels in order
to ensure it got done. We went to the
district attorney, we went to our own attorney, and also we went to the
attorney general to ensure it was something that we could release because we
felt it was something that the town and the community needed to know. Now we’re going on to the next step.
Selectman
Turner: So, anybody else? Yes.
Male Speaker 4: I
was there at that meeting where all the officers were there and the complaints
were issued and Charlie himself made statements that you could not get in
contact with the chief so she was not available for being there. Where’s the inconsistency there?
Selectman Flynn: Do
you have those notes written down somewhere?
Selectman
Turner: That’s, no. It was an open meeting and she could have
attended that night. We did not know
exactly what was going to happen that night, nor did we orchestrate what
happened that night, but that’s, you know, that’s—
Male Speaker 4: Charlie
did know, he said.
Selectman
Turner: Maybe Charlie knew but—
Selectman Flynn: [Inaudible]
to be at the meeting. That’s the only
thing I can tell you.
[SEVERAL PEOPLE TALKING AT ONCE.]
Male Speaker 4: After
everybody else went away, you were here [Inaudible].
Selectman
Turner: Yeah, okay, we’re not
here to discuss that.
Selectman Flynn: We’re
not here to discuss it. I mean, if you
can give me the exact recording of what I said.
Selectman
Turner: I mean, this is, this
is—
Selectman Flynn: I’m
happy to stand up to it.
Selectman
Turner: This is an issue that
we dealt with.
Speaker: You want evidence.
Speaker: You got it.
Selectman
Turner: We dealt with that
night the best we thought we could and, and we’re, and we’ll—
Speaker: Otherwise [Inaudible] will be okay.
Speaker: You do that pretty well,
Mr. Zorick.
Speaker: We’re not here to discuss it, fair
enough, but you are here to answer citizens’ questions.
Selectman
Turner: Yes, we are. And we are working our way through the
process here, and we made a determination that night that that was the best
interest of the community to do what we did and I think that it will bear out
that that was, in fact, the case. And
that’s what we get elected to do. You
guys have anything, town officials? No
town officials? I’ve moved on to town
officials.
Selectman Brazie: Oh,
you did?
Selectman
Turner: He didn’t raise his
hand on time. Are you a town official?
Male Speaker 5: I
just have one question, though, and that’s how long a process is this going be,
take until it’s finished?
Selectman
Turner: It’s going to take
until it’s finished. I don’t know how
long the pro—
Male Speaker 5: We
retain the acting chief and keep going on and paying—
Selectman
Turner: We are going through
due process, and due process sometimes takes time. And it’s not a cheap deal.
But we’re going to come out of this with the proper result in the best interest
of the community. And that’s all I can
say right now. We’ve released the
report and we’re moving forward. You
guys have nothing?
Speaker: I don’t have anything.
Selectman
Turner: Don’t have nothing.
Speaker: For once.
Selectman
Turner: Okay. Part-time officers. We have a couple of guys you’ve brought
before us to appoint.
Selectman Brazie: We
did. Bill Tighe asked me today, though,
if we would hold off on this. He has
been unable to verify some references.
Selectman Flynn: I
move to defer the appointments.
Selectman
Turner: Until our next
meeting. Are we meeting next week?
Selectman Brazie: We
are scheduled to meet next week, yes.
Selectman
Turner: Okay. Let’s meet next week.
Speaker: Sorry.
Selectman
Turner: Police department
issues. We already discussed them.
Selectman Brazie: Well,
yes and no.
Selectman
Turner: What have we got, Mary?
Selectman Brazie: Well,
as you know, Bill Tighe and myself and a full time officer interviewed a couple
of possible candidates for an interim part-time administrative acting police
chief and somewhere, did he send you, did Bill Tighe send you an email?
Selectman
Turner: Yes, he did.
Selectman Brazie: So,
I interviewed the two, and, and I guess, you know, one question is, does the
board feel that two are enough? More
than two people, these two people, actually, were not contacted by the
town. They contacted the town and
expressed their interest, but people that have been contacted by the town for
various reasons are walking away. So,
now we’ve done these interviews and we have these two candidates and the first
question that I would ask is, is the board ready to act on this, or do you want
more follow-up on it?
Selectman Flynn: Okay,
I put my foot in my mouth all night long so I might as well not stop, huh?
Selectman Brazie: Sure,
why not, Charlie?
Selectman Flynn: My
feeling is that when we suspended the chief we appointed an officer in charge
and then we engaged in a management study.
What we’ve gotten for the first time in about 14 years is some real, we’ve
got some morale. We look like we have a
police department that’s working together and currently the officer in charge,
acting chief, whatever he is, is making patrolman’s pay, he’s getting paid
patrolman’s pay to do the job. Of the
two people that were interviewed, I’ve seen the evaluation based on that and
Bill Tighe sent to me, and I find, you know, I like Brian Shaw. You know he’s local, and I think he’s
good. But again we’re talking 20 hours
a week at $20 an hour. And what are we
going to ask that person to do? Are we
going to ask that person to run the department? Are we going to ask that person to follow through on the
management study? What is a role that
person’s going to fill? We have an
officer in charge already who is taking steps, I think, to correct some of the
issues that have been cited as problems in the management study.
So, the question I think we have to ask ourselves, if
we’re going to hire somebody new, or somebody that’s not currently on the
police department, what is the specific guidance that we’re going to provide to
that particular person? Are they going
to be an acting chief? If they’re going
to be an acting chief, what are they going to do? And then the next question is, who or what or how do we address
this management study that we paid $10,000 for but gave us additional work to
do? Who’s going to take care of
that? And then who’s going to report to
the select board and then ultimately to the town? Because I really believe that we owe it to the town to tell them
not only what the issue was, but then how we’re going to address that
issue. And then I think the third
process down the line is, what is our plan for the future police
department? We were, in a sense, told
one thing in November by our current chief, Bucknell, about the cost of hiring
additional officers. And it turns out
that that may not be the case.
So, we have to ask ourselves, what are we going to
present to the town, to the people of the town, in terms of what is the makeup
of our department going to be, and then how much is it going to cost the
taxpayers to have that particular type of makeup. So, I think we’ve got a couple of issues that we really have to
address, because just appointing somebody and not giving that person any
guidance as to how we want to proceed we really have not done anything.
Selectman Brazie: I
agree that we need to come up with some clear delineation of the roles, but do
we agree that we need to have some sort of an acting chief here?
Selectman Flynn: Oh,
I agree.
Selectman Brazie: Oh,
okay, because I thought I might have been hearing—
Selectman Flynn: No.
Selectman Brazie: —hearing
something different.
Selectman
Turner: So, it sounds to me
like we’re not really ready to do anything tonight.
Selectman Brazie: So,
when are we going to be ready, because here we are now, you know, two months
out from making this move and—
Selectman
Turner: Let’s take a time this
week to come up with what we think is a job description, a description of
duties that we’d like this person to perform.
Selectman Brazie: And
do we do that on our own, or do we get together and meet and do that.
Selectman
Turner: Well, I would recommend
that you and Bill get together and, [Inaudible] to delegate. And then fire it off to us and then we can
[Inaudible], because I think we really need to do, you know, let them do the
upper level stuff. I’m not sure, you
know. Maybe manage the investigation
but not necessarily have to do all the day-to-day management of the
department. I think we have people
capable of doing that right now.
Selectman Brazie: I
agree.
Selectman
Turner: And I really don’t want
to interfere with that too much with what’s going on there right now. That’s my thought. I don’t know, what you think, Charlie?
Selectman Flynn: Well,
let me just throw this out, okay, because I really agonized over this, I’ve
thought about this a lot. That I may be
the lone wolf of the group. There’s
been a lot of misinformation that’s circulated through town about what the
current police department is doing.
I’ve had comments made about the humvees, the assault rifles and
everything [Inaudible]. And let me
clarify that a little bit. We were
offered an opportunity to partner with the state police that has access to
certain military surplus items which the town can choose to take advantage of
or not take advantage of. And that
ultimately is a decision that’s make by the select board in an open
meeting. It’s not made by the police
department, but it’s made by the board of select and that’s part of the whole
process. It is something where
military-issue items are made available to the state police, and the state
police then screen them out to the various police agencies throughout the
state. Those police agencies then go
through their boards of select and the select members either say yea or nay and
then if they go back in and it’s on a first-come-first-serve basis. What I’ve seen since this whole situation
started is that each and every one of our police officers act with the utmost,
utmost professionalism and courtesies towards everybody in town, and if they
haven’t, I would like to know about it.
We have Officer Palone, who’s been acting as the officer
in charge, and, essentially, been functioning as the interim chief and what I
would like to propose before the selectmen and I don’t think we need to decide
upon this but I’m going to throw this in tonight, is that we consider
appointing Officer Palone as the Interim Chief at his current salary and then
appointing Officer Carlson, in addition to his normal duties, as Chief
Investigation Officer of the management report, because he is a certified
detective, and also a certified trainer in the State of Massachusetts, to
investigate and report to the board of selectmen on a weekly basis or at each
and every one of our meetings until such time as we have been able to resolve
the issues that have been identified within the management report. Again, it’s not a motion, it’s just a
suggestion.
Selectman
Turner: Yes, sir.
Speaker: I recall that this issue of
appointing an interim chief came up at a select board meeting, and the
impression I got, and I didn’t take notes, was that this was the suggestion or
request of one or more of the outside agencies that had been consulted, the
District Attorney, or the Attorney General, or somebody of that ilk. Now, I, I’ve just, if that’s the case, then
wouldn’t their reasons for making that suggestion constitute the heart of a job
description for such a person and, if that’s not the case, I’ve got it all
wrong, then I wonder why, then, you should consider an outside person at
all. I mean, I can see why the state
might make such a recommendation, but I’m not 100% sure in my own mind that
they did. I may have misheard them.
Selectman Brazie: No,
actually a state office did make that recommendation as well as the consulting
firm that did our management study and our legal counsel. All three of them made the same
recommendations for very valid reasons, I feel. So, we’ll go from here, I guess, and—
Selectman
Turner: I think we’ll—
Selectman Brazie: —pull
together—
Selectman
Turner: I hate to say it, but
let’s put together some job descriptions and duties and responsibilities and be
ready to do things. And if we can find
nothing against the two that we interviewed but if somebody else pops up, I’d
like to interview them, too. Okay?
Selectman Brazie: Mm
hm.
Selectman
Turner: Okay, with you,
Charlie?
Selectman Flynn: Works
for me.
Selectman
Turner: Then we’ll do, deal
with that next Monday.
Selectman Brazie: Okay.
Selectman
Turner: Do we have any
selectmen’s items?
Selectman Brazie: I do. May meetings, as you
know it’s town meeting, it’s the first week of May, right?
No comments:
Post a Comment